Election time

Completely open to any registered user to talk about anything.
PooMonkey
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Canada

Election time

Post by PooMonkey »

If nothing else vote Kerry for the lesser of two evils
User avatar
Yazule
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 3:44 pm
Location: Behind you
Contact:

Post by Yazule »

lol... *watches poo open a can of worms*

look at it this wey, if kerry gets into office he will be the richest person to become president in history!

add to that the fact that he changes his stance on things every other day, and is mounting a slander campaign when he said he would not... lesser of evils? I think not.

fyi I am voting reform and nader
Image
User avatar
ZarnKano
Posts: 1806
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 4:32 pm
Location: Philadelphia PA

Post by ZarnKano »

I cant vote but I do have enough sence to notice that everything Kerry says he is for now, he was against and voted against while in the Senate.

You're best bet in this case - Move to Canada, youre getting a Dick for leader either way if you stay.

My say doesnt matter though so oh well.
User avatar
DenKirson
Posts: 2010
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 5:41 pm
Location: ???
Contact:

Post by DenKirson »

http://www.emogame.com/bushgame.html

Take it seriously, take it as XTREEM satire, whatever.

I find it fun to play as Mr. T, and then call in Murdock, Face, Hannibal and Amy.

Even more fun to play as Howard Dean, just for the scream.
XoR
Posts: 1887
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 4:35 am
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by XoR »

Since Liberals cannot win wars, and I support our troops in Iraq and Afghanastan ... Kerry is toilet paper to me.

and no I am not some wild Bush fan, I criticize him all the time (like opening our borders to illegal aliens, spending WAY to much money etc...)

That is whats great about our nation ... everyone can freely rip on Bush and vote him out if he's doing such a bad job. Good luck!
User avatar
Archangelus
Posts: 4286
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 9:01 pm
Contact:

Post by Archangelus »

Man, political discussions are prickly things.....I'll stay out of this one for now. 8-)

-Arch
Image
PooMonkey
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Canada

Post by PooMonkey »

You make a good point Yaz, but we could also look at it this way. Look at all of the things John Kerry hasn't done, I think they are grossly outweighed by the horrible decisions that Bush has made.
User avatar
Yazule
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 3:44 pm
Location: Behind you
Contact:

Post by Yazule »

I would rather have a known evil than an unknown evil ... think about it...

either way I wont support either of them
User avatar
Ayyyla
Posts: 918
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 12:24 am

Post by Ayyyla »

Zarn has so much sense he's crossed-eyed with it and can't spell it anymore.

Muwahahahahaha (yeah, that's just me staying out of this one and pushing the talk button on my Bush Bobble Head..."It's definitely a budget, it's gotta lot of numbers in it.")
User avatar
DenKirson
Posts: 2010
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 5:41 pm
Location: ???
Contact:

Post by DenKirson »

I'm not too sure why I'm attempting to get into this. I don't vote, so after another Head of Dumbass gets in office, I have the right to complain. Yay for conflict!

---

I looked up a bunch'a of the stuff in BUSHGAME.COM, and on the numbers, all I read was correct. Bush spent $700 Billion, making the Clinton two-hundred Surplus a five-hundred Deficit in almost three years. Tax cuts give Middle and Low class less of everything, and the rich and Bush's closest buds are raking in more billions.

Bush's plan in 2005... He loses Seven hundred, and only promises to make back about two-point-five? In five more years? Claiming a plan like that, one that will take longer than a second term, is a pretty dumb ploy at getting support in the election.

Kerry's slander campaign? Bushites have a whole room filled with HAL (2001!) supercomputers holding even the tinest crap on Kerry, like the deal of of his cursing when an agent bumped into him. You almost knock me over, and I'll go "what the fuck, man". Many of Kerry's claims ("attacks") against Bush are rather legitimate.

---

I read on GeorgeBush.com... Kerry goes against Bush's campaign to lower admission to colleges in Illinois. Bush and Cheney blow him off with "predictable attacks, he should be praising our work in Illinois!"

Besides that there are only around half as many colleges/universities in Illinois than any other state near or larger than itself, Illinois is the fifth largest Electoral Voting state. Bush is attempting to get on the good side of the largest group of voters with the least amount of actual work/payment.

---

YEEEAGGHH! (50+ damage!)
User avatar
Archangelus
Posts: 4286
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 9:01 pm
Contact:

Post by Archangelus »

Just stating a fact....

Bush has to work hard in Illinois, because we are traditionally a Democratic state due to Chicago.

-Arch
User avatar
Yazule
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 3:44 pm
Location: Behind you
Contact:

Post by Yazule »

ahh but Den, bush never said he would not fling mud, it is all about keeping your word, we all know they are both polititians and are professional mud flingers, but when you say you will do something and you dont do it that is a big blow to you in my eyes.

and as I will state at the end of any post on this topic, I will not vote for either of them
Image
PooMonkey
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Canada

Post by PooMonkey »

So bush should have said that he will do all he can to take over all the oil in the east and fight a war that no1 wants to fight anymore 53% of americans don't want the war. If he said that than he would have been keeping his word.
User avatar
Yazule
Posts: 2404
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 3:44 pm
Location: Behind you
Contact:

Post by Yazule »

lol poo, you crack me up... anyone in politics will do whatever they want, but if they say they are going to do something and they do the opposite then I have issue with that politian.

in all actuality bush said "we are going to kick afganistans ass", and we did, go figure nobody talks about all those problems that are still there, iraq this iraq that... pffft

then bush said " we are going to kick Iraq's ass" and we did.... true to his word even though his reasons for going there were sketchy.

and as far as "53% of americans think this" hahahahaha... dont quote poll's to me, I took statistics and know you can make them say pretty much anything you want.

I wont vote for either of them, but I live around a bunch of bush bashers and in my opinion most bush bashing is just propoganda.

bush has little control over the economy, the stock bubble was there before him and it is greenspan who controls interest rates.

with the crash in the economy the tax base is down, hence a huge deficit... again he has no control over that..

those are the two biggies I hear from people besides the war, which I do not support, but if we are going to go there then we should do it right... I dont think we are there for the right reasons but because we are there we need to take care of our boys.

I wont vote for either, but bush is downright abused by liberals
Image
User avatar
DenKirson
Posts: 2010
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 5:41 pm
Location: ???
Contact:

Post by DenKirson »

Bush is making Kerry look like a bad leader by everything Kerry does, even things completely unrelated to running the US. Kerry points out all the dumb crap Bush does in office about office.

Know what? I will vote. I'm voting for Howard Dean's Scream. Not Dean, just his scream could run office. YEEEAAGH!
Post Reply